Episcopal Church of the Incarnation
The Seventeenth Sunday after Pentecost [Proper 21B]
Num. 11.4–6, 10–16,
24–29 Ps.
19.7–14
May the Lord be
in my mind, on my lips, and in my heart,
that I may rightly
and truly proclaim His Holy Word. Amen.
In Fyodor
Dostoyevsky’s classic philosophical novel, The Brothers Karamazov, the
catch phrase of the middle brother, Ivan Fyodorovich, is “Everything is
permitted.” Ivan espouses a strong
rationalist, atheistic philosophy that leads in part to the murder of his own
father. The world inhabited by Ivan (at
least in his own mind) is one in which there is no right or wrong, only
decisions of greater or less utility. As
radical as this worldview may be, it is a worldview that has been adopted by
much of our popular culture, but in observing this let me be quick to point out
that the kingdom described by Jesus is no less radical; indeed, it is more
radically different still. It is a world
in which our Lord describes personal choices at the extreme fringe of
contemplation: cutting off a hand;
cutting off a foot; plucking out an eye.
It is a world in which these choices are described in the context things
beyond even that extreme fringe of contemplation: a hell of fire and self-consumption.
Cutting off
a hand sounds radical, as it should, and yet we have become so inured to a
culture in which “everything is permitted” that we don’t often pause to
consider just how abnormal an absence of moral distinctions is. We can certainly select examples of evil that
will elicit universal condemnation–evils like the Nazi death camps of the
Holocaust–but such agreement comes about because a death camp is so far beyond
the experience of almost all people that it doesn’t seem quite real, and so
does not seem to present to each individual an individual moral choice.
And why
have I used the example of a death camp?
I am reminded of this example because of what Elie Wiesel records in his
famous memoir of the Holocaust, entitled Night. Wiesel writes of arriving at
Not far from us, flames were
leaping up from a ditch, gigantic flames.
They were burning something. A
lorry drew up at the pit and delivered its load—little children. Babies!
Yes, I saw it ... It was a nightmare ...
My father’s voice drew me
from my thoughts: ...
He did not want to see the
burning of his only son.
My forehead was bathed in
cold sweat. But I told him that I did
not believe that they could burn people in our age, that humanity would never
tolerate it. ...
“Humanity? [he said]
Humanity is not concerned with us.
Today anything is allowed.
Anything is possible ...”
(Night, trans. S.
Rodway.
Anything
is possible. Everything is
permitted: the Holocaust can be seen
as the culmination of a nihilistic self-focus that makes no distinction in
moral choices, which indeed holds that all choices are just that, choices which
are neither moral nor immoral.
In
our postmodern world reality is defined with reference to experience only;
“truth” is self-referential only, and so “everything is permitted”. Who would have imagined another Holocaust,
after the discovery of the death camps? And
yet, within my own lifetime we have seen extermination centers in
And
what does Jesus say? He calls us into
the Way, the Truth, and the Life, embodied and given to us in Him. But He makes clear that this Way, this Truth,
and this Life involve choices–individual choices taken freely in following our
Lord–by which we choose a reality otherwise beyond our understanding because it
is outside of our experience.
It
is a truism in the history of literature and art that we can understand hell
better than we can grasp heaven. Even
Jesus describes paradise only in parables.
From biblical times through Dante Alighieri’s Comedia, to our own day, hell is described in vivid
imagery, while heaven is left much more to our imagination, and our imagination
fails to provide us with images that seem at all real. Perhaps this is a problem of
frame-of-reference. To return to the
Holocaust, consider the testimony of Edith P., recorded on video for the
Fortunoff Video Archive of Holocaust Testimonies at
One morning, I think it was
morning or early afternoon, we arrived.
The train stopped ... [a]nd a friend of mine said ... “I’m going to sit
down and you’re going to stand on my shoulders [to look through this little
window].” ... I looked out. And ... I ... saw
From
Edith P’s perspective, an ordinary railroad siding looked like paradise,
because it was the first place in her recent and now timeless experience that
was not filled with dirt, flames, a brute existence of death and hatred. And from ours? What does paradise look like? We’re not very good at describing it, because
unlike the normal people in Edith P’s vision, heaven is not part of any
experience we have had. Or is it? Think, for example, about a time in your life
when you did something wrong, when you did something of which you were ashamed,
and for which you expected punishment, only to find that when you were
discovered—what happened? You were
forgiven, and the wrong was forgotten.
Through no merit of your own you were just forgiven by someone
who had the power to condemn you. Heaven
feels like that. Heaven looks like what
you see in the eyes of one whose eyes communicate to you real love.
What
does heaven sound like? I don’t know,
although sometimes in liturgy or music I’ll get a chill, and get teary-eyed,
and not know why. I knew a man who was
knocked unconscious by an artillery round, and when he awoke two days later in
a field hospital in a church in Belgium, the convent girls’ choir was singing
Christmas carols, and heaven to him was the sound of female voices singing of
peace on earth, good will toward men.
The smell of heaven was evergreen and incense. The taste of heaven was communion wine daubed
upon his lips.
That
last example, the awakening of one from a near-death experience, is, like those
of Elie Wiesel and Edith P., beyond the experience of most of us, and so it
illuminates a common factor. It tells us
that what is beyond our own experience can best be understood through
testimony, through the testimony of another who has been there, who has seen
and heard and now speaks of this place we don’t know. Like Jesus, who tells us, “... we speak of
what we know, and bear witness to what we have seen ...” (John 3.11). Jesus, who tells us that the kingdom of heaven
has come near to us, and that to live this kingdom we must choose it; we must
make choices between God’s will and our own, between sin and
righteousness.
Jesus
testifies, and offers us choices. But
each of us testifies as well. We testify
to our faith in God when we choose His will over our own. We testify to hope when we choose the kingdom
of heaven rather than a world in which no distinction is made between good and
evil, a world in which “everything is permitted”. We testify to love when we choose to
serve. We testify to forgiveness when we
forgive.
Testimony
is real. It is a form of evidence. It is a way by which we witness to each other
that reality far surpasses our own limited individual experience, and that the
kingdom of heaven is a radical choice.
We choose the “peace which passeth all understanding”.
Glory be to the
Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost; as it was
in the
beginning is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.